Eswatini vs Saudi Arabia: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Eswatini
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 208.83 1000 USD against 200.24 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 8.59 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.44 1000 USD | 60.98 1000 USD | 43.54 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 7.83 1000 USD | 572.45 1000 USD | 564.62 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 146.37 1000 USD | 781.12 1000 USD | 634.76 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Eswatini or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 208.83 1000 USD against 200.24 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Eswatini and Saudi Arabia?
- 8.59 1000 USD, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saudi Arabia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Eswatini and Saudi Arabia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Eswatini ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf