Georgia vs Uzbekistan: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Georgia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1,346 1000 USD against 1,136 1000 USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 210 1000 USD.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Georgia ranks 37th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 98 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,163 1000 USD | 3,427 1000 USD | 2,264 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 372.67 1000 USD | 3,609 1000 USD | 3,237 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 733.61 1000 USD | 4,350 1000 USD | 3,617 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Georgia or Uzbekistan?
- Georgia, at 1,346 1000 USD against 1,136 1000 USD in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Georgia and Uzbekistan?
- 210 1000 USD, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Uzbekistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Georgia ranks 37th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf