Jordan vs Kazakhstan: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 16.45 1000 USD against 13.55 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.9 1000 USD.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Jordan ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 88th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.78 1000 USD | 622.95 1000 USD | 574.16 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 277.11 1000 USD | 363.63 1000 USD | 86.52 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 971.29 1000 USD | 279.44 1000 USD | 691.86 1000 USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Jordan or Kazakhstan?
- Jordan, at 16.45 1000 USD against 13.55 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Jordan and Kazakhstan?
- 2.9 1000 USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Kazakhstan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Kazakhstan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Jordan ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 88th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf