Luxembourg vs Malawi: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Luxembourg
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 361.31 1000 USD against 298.77 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 62.54 1000 USD.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 50th of 98 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.23 1000 USD | 60.2 1000 USD | 45.03 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,335 1000 USD | 963.98 1000 USD | 371.41 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 250.08 1000 USD | 218.67 1000 USD | 31.41 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Luxembourg or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 361.31 1000 USD against 298.77 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 62.54 1000 USD, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Malawi rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Luxembourg ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 50th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf