Nicaragua vs Peru: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Nicaragua
- Peru
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 259.2 1000 USD against 224.56 1000 USD in Peru, a difference of 34.64 1000 USD.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 56th and Peru ranks 58th of 98 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.56 1000 USD | 570.28 1000 USD | 557.72 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2010s | 146.03 1000 USD | 746.52 1000 USD | 600.48 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2020s | 135.67 1000 USD | 346.35 1000 USD | 210.67 1000 USD | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Nicaragua or Peru?
- Nicaragua, at 259.2 1000 USD against 224.56 1000 USD in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Nicaragua and Peru?
- 34.64 1000 USD, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Peru rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Nicaragua ranks 56th and Peru ranks 58th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf