Nicaragua vs Saudi Arabia: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Nicaragua
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 259.2 1000 USD against 208.83 1000 USD in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 50.37 1000 USD.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 56th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 171.47 1000 USD | 169.84 1000 USD | 1.64 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 12.15 1000 USD | 208.83 1000 USD | 196.68 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Nicaragua or Saudi Arabia?
- Nicaragua, at 259.2 1000 USD against 208.83 1000 USD in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Nicaragua and Saudi Arabia?
- 50.37 1000 USD, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Saudi Arabia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Saudi Arabia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Nicaragua ranks 56th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf