Peru vs Saudi Arabia: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Peru
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 224.56 1000 USD against 208.83 1000 USD in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 15.73 1000 USD.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Peru ranks 58th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 324.14 1000 USD | 74.1 1000 USD | 250.04 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2010s | 712.09 1000 USD | 223.95 1000 USD | 488.14 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2020s | 172.88 1000 USD | 523.99 1000 USD | 351.11 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Peru or Saudi Arabia?
- Peru, at 224.56 1000 USD against 208.83 1000 USD in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Peru and Saudi Arabia?
- 15.73 1000 USD, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Saudi Arabia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Saudi Arabia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Peru ranks 58th and Saudi Arabia ranks 59th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf