Poland vs South Africa: Ammonium sulphate — Export value
Ammonium sulphate — Export value over time
- Poland
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 7,451 1000 USD against 5,386 1000 USD in Poland, a difference of 2,065 1000 USD.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.4 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 19th of 98 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49,982 1000 USD | 1,968 1000 USD | 48,015 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 40,352 1000 USD | 3,342 1000 USD | 37,009 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2020s | 12,575 1000 USD | 8,758 1000 USD | 3,817 1000 USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — export value, Poland or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 7,451 1000 USD against 5,386 1000 USD in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — export value between Poland and South Africa?
- 2,065 1000 USD, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Poland and South Africa rank globally for ammonium sulphate — export value?
- Poland ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 19th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf