Afghanistan vs Mongolia: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Afghanistan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 317.47 t against 278 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 39.47 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 129th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.67 t | 32.88 t | 30.21 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 106.53 t | 73.67 t | 32.87 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 799.32 t | 235.35 t | 563.97 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Afghanistan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 317.47 t against 278 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Afghanistan and Mongolia?
- 39.47 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Afghanistan and Mongolia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Afghanistan ranks 129th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf