Azerbaijan vs Luxembourg: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Azerbaijan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 4,031 t against 3,804 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 227 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 95th and Luxembourg ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 397.85 t | 2,661 t | 2,263 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 2,086 t | 5,816 t | 3,730 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 3,071 t | 5,336 t | 2,265 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Azerbaijan or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 4,031 t against 3,804 t in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Azerbaijan and Luxembourg?
- 227 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Azerbaijan ranks 95th and Luxembourg ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf