Brunei Darussalam vs Saint Lucia: Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 16 t against 13.26 t in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 2.74 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.2 times Brunei Darussalam's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 155th and Saint Lucia ranks 153rd of 190 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.77 t | 10.55 t | 6.79 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 3.46 t | 36.05 t | 32.58 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate β import quantity, Brunei Darussalam or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 16 t against 13.26 t in Brunei Darussalam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate β import quantity between Brunei Darussalam and Saint Lucia?
- 2.74 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Saint Lucia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Saint Lucia rank globally for ammonium sulphate β import quantity?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 155th and Saint Lucia ranks 153rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf