Burkina Faso vs Solomon Islands: Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0.01 t against 0 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.01 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Solomon Islands ranks 166th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,522 t | 378.09 t | 6,144 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 4,459 t | 6.18 t | 4,452 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 0.425 t | 1.44 t | 1.02 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate β import quantity, Burkina Faso or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 0.01 t against 0 t in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate β import quantity between Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 0.01 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands rank globally for ammonium sulphate β import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Solomon Islands ranks 166th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf