China, Hong Kong SAR vs Samoa: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Samoa
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.6 t against 0.3 t in Samoa, a difference of 0.3 t.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 2.0 times Samoa's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 168th and Samoa ranks 171st of 190 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 113.6 t | 0.4875 t | 113.11 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 336.49 t | 0.37 t | 336.12 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Samoa?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.6 t against 0.3 t in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Samoa?
- 0.3 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Samoa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Samoa rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 168th and Samoa ranks 171st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf