Colombia vs South Africa: Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity over time
- Colombia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 399,761 t against 176,253 t in Colombia, a difference of 223,508 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 2.3 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Colombia ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 10th of 176 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,899 t | 69,572 t | 63,674 t | South Africa |
| 2010s | 86,722 t | 133,536 t | 46,814 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | 164,641 t | 322,295 t | 157,654 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate β import quantity, Colombia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 399,761 t against 176,253 t in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate β import quantity between Colombia and South Africa?
- 223,508 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and South Africa rank globally for ammonium sulphate β import quantity?
- Colombia ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 10th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate β Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf