Cook Islands vs Sierra Leone: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Cook Islands
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 0.12 t against 0.07 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.05 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.7 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 164th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.86 t | 10.08 t | 7.22 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 7.06 t | 41.88 t | 34.82 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Cook Islands or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 0.12 t against 0.07 t in Cook Islands as of 2017.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Cook Islands and Sierra Leone?
- 0.05 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Sierra Leone?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Cook Islands and Sierra Leone rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Cook Islands ranks 164th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf