Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Costa Rica
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 23,053 t against 18,161 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 4,892 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,469 t | 2,103 t | 10,366 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 13,084 t | 12,074 t | 1,010 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 16,895 t | 33,600 t | 16,705 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 23,053 t against 18,161 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 4,892 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Costa Rica ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf