Côte d'Ivoire vs Myanmar: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 117,703 t against 13,651 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 104,052 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 8.6 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 31st and Myanmar ranks 28th of 32 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23,676 t | 3,797 t | 19,879 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 23,520 t | 18,571 t | 4,948 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 22,386 t | 61,581 t | 39,195 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Côte d'Ivoire or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 117,703 t against 13,651 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 104,052 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 31st and Myanmar ranks 28th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf