Eswatini vs Singapore: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 939.68 t against 774.75 t in Eswatini, a difference of 164.93 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 114th and Singapore ranks 113th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,307 t | 109.63 t | 1,197 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 640.6 t | 1,209 t | 568.79 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 976.44 t | 1,371 t | 394.7 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Eswatini or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 939.68 t against 774.75 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Eswatini and Singapore?
- 164.93 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Singapore?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Singapore rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 114th and Singapore ranks 113th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf