Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 774.75 t against 686.3 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 88.45 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 114th and Tajikistan ranks 115th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 704.99 t | 25.82 t | 679.16 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 640.6 t | 2,551 t | 1,910 t | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 976.44 t | 1,844 t | 867.93 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Eswatini or Tajikistan?
- Eswatini, at 774.75 t against 686.3 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Eswatini and Tajikistan?
- 88.45 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tajikistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Tajikistan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 114th and Tajikistan ranks 115th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf