Gabon vs Papua New Guinea: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Gabon
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1,444 t against 1,191 t in Gabon, a difference of 253 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Gabon ranks 112th and Papua New Guinea ranks 110th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 232.17 t | 1,875 t | 1,642 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 3,926 t | 1,321 t | 2,605 t | Gabon |
| 2020s | 596.37 t | 117.73 t | 478.64 t | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Gabon or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1,444 t against 1,191 t in Gabon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Gabon and Papua New Guinea?
- 253 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Papua New Guinea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Gabon and Papua New Guinea rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Gabon ranks 112th and Papua New Guinea ranks 110th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf