Kyrgyzstan vs Papua New Guinea: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1,456 t against 1,444 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 12 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 100th and Papua New Guinea ranks 101st of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 349.06 t | 1,641 t | 1,292 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 1,146 t | 1,321 t | 174.66 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 976.06 t | 446.37 t | 529.69 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Kyrgyzstan or Papua New Guinea?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1,456 t against 1,444 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 12 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 100th and Papua New Guinea ranks 101st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf