Montenegro vs Turkmenistan: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Montenegro
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 31.87 t against 23.75 t in Montenegro, a difference of 8.12 t.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.3 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Montenegro ranks 139th and Turkmenistan ranks 137th of 177 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2467 t | 146.62 t | 146.37 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 14.07 t | 20.84 t | 6.77 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 58.12 t | 309.35 t | 251.23 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Montenegro or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 31.87 t against 23.75 t in Montenegro as of 2021.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Montenegro and Turkmenistan?
- 8.12 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Turkmenistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Montenegro and Turkmenistan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Montenegro ranks 139th and Turkmenistan ranks 137th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf