New Caledonia vs Solomon Islands: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- New Caledonia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0.01 t against 0 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.01 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 182nd and Solomon Islands ranks 180th of 190 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.66 t | 378.09 t | 374.43 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 0 t | 4.23 t | 4.23 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, New Caledonia or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 0.01 t against 0 t in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between New Caledonia and Solomon Islands?
- 0.01 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Solomon Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do New Caledonia and Solomon Islands rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- New Caledonia ranks 182nd and Solomon Islands ranks 180th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf