Saint Lucia vs Uzbekistan: Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity
Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity over time
- Saint Lucia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 22.23 t against 16 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 6.23 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.4 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 153rd and Uzbekistan ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.55 t | 0.3425 t | 15.21 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 29.74 t | 27.08 t | 2.67 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 16 t | 98.43 t | 82.43 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import quantity, Saint Lucia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 22.23 t against 16 t in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import quantity between Saint Lucia and Uzbekistan?
- 6.23 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Uzbekistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Saint Lucia and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import quantity?
- Saint Lucia ranks 153rd and Uzbekistan ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf