Afghanistan vs Malta: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Afghanistan
- Malta
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 62.49 1000 USD against 55.41 1000 USD in Malta, a difference of 7.08 1000 USD.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malta ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 136th and Malta ranks 138th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.425 1000 USD | 207.8 1000 USD | 207.37 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2010s | 44.49 1000 USD | 97.13 1000 USD | 52.64 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2020s | 182.3 1000 USD | 135.71 1000 USD | 46.59 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Afghanistan or Malta?
- Afghanistan, at 62.49 1000 USD against 55.41 1000 USD in Malta as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Afghanistan and Malta?
- 7.08 1000 USD, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Afghanistan and Malta rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Afghanistan ranks 136th and Malta ranks 138th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf