Australia vs Ukraine: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Australia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 108,287 1000 USD against 97,682 1000 USD in Australia, a difference of 10,605 1000 USD.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 10th and Ukraine ranks 7th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,030 1000 USD | 433.14 1000 USD | 5,596 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 19,096 1000 USD | 29,067 1000 USD | 9,971 1000 USD | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 64,328 1000 USD | 67,645 1000 USD | 3,316 1000 USD | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Australia or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 108,287 1000 USD against 97,682 1000 USD in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Australia and Ukraine?
- 10,605 1000 USD, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Ukraine?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Ukraine rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Australia ranks 10th and Ukraine ranks 7th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf