Azerbaijan vs Uganda: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 922.11 1000 USD against 779.01 1000 USD in Azerbaijan, a difference of 143.1 1000 USD.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uganda ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 91st and Uganda ranks 88th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.24 1000 USD | 111.46 1000 USD | 64.22 1000 USD | Uganda |
| 2010s | 415.24 1000 USD | 340.99 1000 USD | 74.25 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 834.35 1000 USD | 487.88 1000 USD | 346.47 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Azerbaijan or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 922.11 1000 USD against 779.01 1000 USD in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Azerbaijan and Uganda?
- 143.1 1000 USD, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Uganda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Uganda rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 91st and Uganda ranks 88th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf