Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Bangladesh
- Cambodia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 2,329 1000 USD against 2,026 1000 USD in Cambodia, a difference of 303 1000 USD.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 83rd and Cambodia ranks 86th of 190 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 711.16 1000 USD | 42.9 1000 USD | 668.26 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 1,853 1000 USD | 320.53 1000 USD | 1,533 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 2,902 1000 USD | 1,360 1000 USD | 1,542 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Bangladesh or Cambodia?
- Bangladesh, at 2,329 1000 USD against 2,026 1000 USD in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 303 1000 USD, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Cambodia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Bangladesh ranks 83rd and Cambodia ranks 86th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf