Belarus vs Sudan (former): Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 268.34 1000 USD against 231.22 1000 USD in Sudan (former), a difference of 37.12 1000 USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 117th and Sudan (former) ranks 118th of 190 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.06 1000 USD | 175.11 1000 USD | 81.05 1000 USD | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 4.25 1000 USD | 1,348 1000 USD | 1,344 1000 USD | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Belarus or Sudan (former)?
- Belarus, at 268.34 1000 USD against 231.22 1000 USD in Sudan (former) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Belarus and Sudan (former)?
- 37.12 1000 USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sudan (former)?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Sudan (former) rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Belarus ranks 117th and Sudan (former) ranks 118th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf