Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 13,893 1000 USD against 12,740 1000 USD in Belgium, a difference of 1,153 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38,059 1000 USD | 8,857 1000 USD | 29,202 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 31,697 1000 USD | 13,631 1000 USD | 18,066 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 21,025 1000 USD | 17,154 1000 USD | 3,871 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 13,893 1000 USD against 12,740 1000 USD in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 1,153 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Belgium ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf