Botswana vs Mongolia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Botswana
- Mongolia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 121.73 1000 USD against 75.43 1000 USD in Mongolia, a difference of 46.3 1000 USD.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.6 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 129th and Mongolia ranks 131st of 190 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.99 1000 USD | 4.87 1000 USD | 39.12 1000 USD | Botswana |
| 2010s | 84.45 1000 USD | 37.37 1000 USD | 47.08 1000 USD | Botswana |
| 2020s | 190.6 1000 USD | 79.06 1000 USD | 111.55 1000 USD | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Botswana or Mongolia?
- Botswana, at 121.73 1000 USD against 75.43 1000 USD in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Botswana and Mongolia?
- 46.3 1000 USD, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mongolia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Mongolia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Botswana ranks 129th and Mongolia ranks 131st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf