Bulgaria vs Singapore: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Bulgaria
- Singapore
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 2,891 1000 USD against 2,162 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 729 1000 USD.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 75th and Singapore ranks 78th of 177 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 191.08 1000 USD | 86.81 1000 USD | 104.27 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 3,910 1000 USD | 1,609 1000 USD | 2,302 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 4,980 1000 USD | 2,337 1000 USD | 2,643 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Bulgaria or Singapore?
- Bulgaria, at 2,891 1000 USD against 2,162 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Bulgaria and Singapore?
- 729 1000 USD, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Singapore?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Singapore rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Bulgaria ranks 75th and Singapore ranks 78th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf