Cambodia vs Singapore: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Cambodia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 2,162 1000 USD against 2,026 1000 USD in Cambodia, a difference of 136 1000 USD.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Singapore ahead.
Cambodia ranks 86th and Singapore ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.9 1000 USD | 42.3 1000 USD | 0.6 1000 USD | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 320.53 1000 USD | 1,609 1000 USD | 1,288 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2020s | 1,360 1000 USD | 2,337 1000 USD | 977 1000 USD | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Cambodia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 2,162 1000 USD against 2,026 1000 USD in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Cambodia and Singapore?
- 136 1000 USD, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Singapore?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Singapore rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Cambodia ranks 86th and Singapore ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf