Cameroon vs Sri Lanka: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Cameroon
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 14,638 1000 USD against 13,893 1000 USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 745 1000 USD.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Cameroon ranks 46th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,415 1000 USD | 8,857 1000 USD | 5,442 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 7,215 1000 USD | 13,631 1000 USD | 6,416 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 9,094 1000 USD | 17,970 1000 USD | 8,875 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Cameroon or Sri Lanka?
- Cameroon, at 14,638 1000 USD against 13,893 1000 USD in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Cameroon and Sri Lanka?
- 745 1000 USD, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Sri Lanka?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Sri Lanka rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Cameroon ranks 46th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf