Chile vs Kazakhstan: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Chile
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 7,103 1000 USD against 6,133 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 970 1000 USD.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 66th and Kazakhstan ranks 65th of 190 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,115 1000 USD | 1,071 1000 USD | 43.9 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 2,746 1000 USD | 2,580 1000 USD | 165.16 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2020s | 9,291 1000 USD | 8,680 1000 USD | 610.94 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Chile or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 7,103 1000 USD against 6,133 1000 USD in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 970 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Kazakhstan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Chile ranks 66th and Kazakhstan ranks 65th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf