Congo vs Dominica: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Congo
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 1.55 1000 USD against 0.99 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 0.56 1000 USD.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.6 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 168th and Dominica ranks 166th of 190 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.88 1000 USD | 5.15 1000 USD | 19.73 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2010s | 2.69 1000 USD | 1.04 1000 USD | 1.65 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2020s | 294.76 1000 USD | 0.8575 1000 USD | 293.9 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Congo or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 1.55 1000 USD against 0.99 1000 USD in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Congo and Dominica?
- 0.56 1000 USD, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Dominica?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Dominica rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Congo ranks 168th and Dominica ranks 166th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf