Congo vs New Caledonia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Congo
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 1.15 1000 USD against 0.99 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 0.16 1000 USD.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Congo ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 155th of 177 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 126.82 1000 USD | 1.79 1000 USD | 125.03 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2010s | 4.15 1000 USD | 3.77 1000 USD | 0.38 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Congo or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 1.15 1000 USD against 0.99 1000 USD in Congo as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Congo and New Caledonia?
- 0.16 1000 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Caledonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2013.
- How do Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Congo ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 155th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf