Costa Rica vs Israel: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Israel
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 4,180 1000 USD against 3,805 1000 USD in Israel, a difference of 375 1000 USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Israel ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 71st and Israel ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,265 1000 USD | 3,650 1000 USD | 1,385 1000 USD | Israel |
| 2010s | 2,991 1000 USD | 3,260 1000 USD | 268.94 1000 USD | Israel |
| 2020s | 4,758 1000 USD | 4,177 1000 USD | 580.89 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Costa Rica or Israel?
- Costa Rica, at 4,180 1000 USD against 3,805 1000 USD in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Costa Rica and Israel?
- 375 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Israel?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Israel rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 71st and Israel ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf