Costa Rica vs Lebanon: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 5,066 1000 USD against 4,180 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 886 1000 USD.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 71st and Lebanon ranks 70th of 190 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,265 1000 USD | 3,715 1000 USD | 1,450 1000 USD | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 2,991 1000 USD | 6,244 1000 USD | 3,253 1000 USD | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 4,758 1000 USD | 6,402 1000 USD | 1,643 1000 USD | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Costa Rica or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 5,066 1000 USD against 4,180 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Costa Rica and Lebanon?
- 886 1000 USD, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lebanon?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Lebanon rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 71st and Lebanon ranks 70th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf