Cyprus vs Madagascar: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Cyprus
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 138.99 1000 USD against 121.91 1000 USD in Madagascar, a difference of 17.08 1000 USD.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 127th and Madagascar ranks 128th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 504.06 1000 USD | 16.01 1000 USD | 488.05 1000 USD | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 383.34 1000 USD | 1,278 1000 USD | 894.25 1000 USD | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 145 1000 USD | 788.72 1000 USD | 643.72 1000 USD | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Cyprus or Madagascar?
- Cyprus, at 138.99 1000 USD against 121.91 1000 USD in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Cyprus and Madagascar?
- 17.08 1000 USD, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Madagascar?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Madagascar rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Cyprus ranks 127th and Madagascar ranks 128th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf