Djibouti vs Slovenia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Djibouti
- Slovenia
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 618.92 1000 USD against 375.24 1000 USD in Slovenia, a difference of 243.68 1000 USD.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.6 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Slovenia ahead.
Djibouti ranks 99th and Slovenia ranks 102nd of 177 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 116.17 1000 USD | 139.5 1000 USD | 23.33 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 236.52 1000 USD | 377.08 1000 USD | 140.56 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 533.76 1000 USD | 2,244 1000 USD | 1,710 1000 USD | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Djibouti or Slovenia?
- Djibouti, at 618.92 1000 USD against 375.24 1000 USD in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Djibouti and Slovenia?
- 243.68 1000 USD, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Slovenia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Djibouti and Slovenia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Djibouti ranks 99th and Slovenia ranks 102nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf