Dominica vs Maldives: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Dominica
- Maldives
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 1.55 1000 USD against 0.85 1000 USD in Maldives, a difference of 0.7 1000 USD.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.8 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 166th and Maldives ranks 169th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.91 1000 USD | 4.87 1000 USD | 15.04 1000 USD | Dominica |
| 2010s | 2.84 1000 USD | 3.5 1000 USD | 0.6671 1000 USD | Maldives |
| 2020s | 0.8575 1000 USD | 3.5 1000 USD | 2.64 1000 USD | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Dominica or Maldives?
- Dominica, at 1.55 1000 USD against 0.85 1000 USD in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Dominica and Maldives?
- 0.7 1000 USD, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Maldives?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Maldives rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Dominica ranks 166th and Maldives ranks 169th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf