Egypt vs Jamaica: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Egypt
- Jamaica
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1,530 1000 USD against 1,284 1000 USD in Jamaica, a difference of 246 1000 USD.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 89th and Jamaica ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,579 1000 USD | 2,487 1000 USD | 1,092 1000 USD | Egypt |
| 2010s | 8,688 1000 USD | 1,935 1000 USD | 6,752 1000 USD | Egypt |
| 2020s | 1,891 1000 USD | 2,158 1000 USD | 266.08 1000 USD | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Egypt or Jamaica?
- Egypt, at 1,530 1000 USD against 1,284 1000 USD in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Egypt and Jamaica?
- 246 1000 USD, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Jamaica?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Jamaica rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Egypt ranks 89th and Jamaica ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf