Eswatini vs Guyana: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Guyana
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 206.29 1000 USD against 195.93 1000 USD in Guyana, a difference of 10.36 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Eswatini ranks 121st and Guyana ranks 124th of 190 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 229.32 1000 USD | 2,161 1000 USD | 1,932 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 224.92 1000 USD | 2,289 1000 USD | 2,064 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 237.65 1000 USD | 820.74 1000 USD | 583.1 1000 USD | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Eswatini or Guyana?
- Eswatini, at 206.29 1000 USD against 195.93 1000 USD in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Eswatini and Guyana?
- 10.36 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 121st and Guyana ranks 124th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf