Georgia vs Mauritania: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Georgia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 19.78 1000 USD against 14.56 1000 USD in Mauritania, a difference of 5.22 1000 USD.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritania ahead.
Georgia ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 146th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.19 1000 USD | 0.22 1000 USD | 0.03 1000 USD | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 43.26 1000 USD | 79.78 1000 USD | 36.52 1000 USD | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 20.41 1000 USD | 20.22 1000 USD | 0.19 1000 USD | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Georgia or Mauritania?
- Georgia, at 19.78 1000 USD against 14.56 1000 USD in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Georgia and Mauritania?
- 5.22 1000 USD, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Mauritania rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Georgia ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 146th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf