Grenada vs Uzbekistan: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Grenada
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 5.09 1000 USD against 2.82 1000 USD in Grenada, a difference of 2.27 1000 USD.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.8 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 147th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.31 1000 USD | 0.7857 1000 USD | 3.52 1000 USD | Grenada |
| 2010s | 1.44 1000 USD | 9.83 1000 USD | 8.39 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 1.48 1000 USD | 13.72 1000 USD | 12.24 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Grenada or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 5.09 1000 USD against 2.82 1000 USD in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Grenada and Uzbekistan?
- 2.27 1000 USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Uzbekistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Grenada ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 147th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf