Guatemala vs Lithuania: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Guatemala
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 35,484 1000 USD against 34,122 1000 USD in Guatemala, a difference of 1,362 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 26th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,389 1000 USD | 7,838 1000 USD | 2,551 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 20,394 1000 USD | 32,086 1000 USD | 11,693 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 36,941 1000 USD | 59,750 1000 USD | 22,809 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Guatemala or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 35,484 1000 USD against 34,122 1000 USD in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 1,362 1000 USD, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Lithuania rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Guatemala ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 26th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf