Guatemala vs Morocco: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Guatemala
- Morocco
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 34,122 1000 USD against 26,385 1000 USD in Morocco, a difference of 7,737 1000 USD.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Morocco ahead.
Guatemala ranks 27th and Morocco ranks 29th of 190 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,389 1000 USD | 10,219 1000 USD | 170.02 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 20,394 1000 USD | 13,635 1000 USD | 6,759 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 36,941 1000 USD | 17,420 1000 USD | 19,520 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Guatemala or Morocco?
- Guatemala, at 34,122 1000 USD against 26,385 1000 USD in Morocco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Guatemala and Morocco?
- 7,737 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Morocco?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Morocco rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Guatemala ranks 27th and Morocco ranks 29th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf