Guatemala vs Zambia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Guatemala
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 36,844 1000 USD against 34,122 1000 USD in Guatemala, a difference of 2,722 1000 USD.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 27th and Zambia ranks 24th of 190 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,039 1000 USD | 2,228 1000 USD | 7,811 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 20,394 1000 USD | 11,890 1000 USD | 8,504 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 37,645 1000 USD | 14,250 1000 USD | 23,396 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Guatemala or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 36,844 1000 USD against 34,122 1000 USD in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Guatemala and Zambia?
- 2,722 1000 USD, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zambia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Zambia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Guatemala ranks 27th and Zambia ranks 24th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf