Guinea-Bissau vs Montenegro: Ammonium sulphate β Import value
Ammonium sulphate β Import value over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 7.86 1000 USD against 5.74 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2.12 1000 USD.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Montenegro ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 154th and Montenegro ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.55 1000 USD | 1.9 1000 USD | 0.3467 1000 USD | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 4.82 1000 USD | 14.46 1000 USD | 9.63 1000 USD | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate β import value, Guinea-Bissau or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 7.86 1000 USD against 5.74 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate β import value between Guinea-Bissau and Montenegro?
- 2.12 1000 USD, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Montenegro rank globally for ammonium sulphate β import value?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 154th and Montenegro ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate β Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf